No 23. ? We can now
No24
a copy of (23)
received
refly to (15) by sending
which has been
from Hong Kong in nefly
12
to (17) a cofy of which was sent to do
with (18) and
say
tuxt it
affears from (23) that Mohamedan
mariages
are
in fac
fack recgnised
as valid in the louts of
b of Hong Kong
? Copy to BofE 17 nef (22)
22-12-31
Noted Precedents
will probated ratify
9
agne
that (23)
o
simed
that
they
be sent
a
Fo
The is
copy
an der co
the question actinall asked
quiti definiti
& F.O.
(9 prosene
action on 24
me)
in int referred to me
Walder
23/12
23.12.31
31 tour
76
B/E. (M/= 24). Bin - -
}
- 6 JAN 1932
Kefo
75 To 5.0. (Me 23). –