3
does not
preliminary visit should ta
A Say
commit the H.K Govt.
in the cusidaction of any
subsequent engagement of
tue
Consulting Engineers. The
atcnctive proposals mentioned in
bara 34 ☹
1
have
not been criticusy
Examined in this office
leaves the considactin
terms waking tortons to the
Lether (13
9
Gort.
H.K.
9
24 To 6. 4. /wife 23
G.C. Miles
25
12.30
Itlalder
29-12-30
1.1
atom 31.
95
6A
Shult that there is
nv
571/31 for the Col. Gout necernity to
expling the Consulting Engineers after Mor Yourley's visit, but consider that they
would be well advised to do so.
? in reply to (23), transmit copies
of (24) and (25) with enclosure.
The question
is not so much whether Hong Kong should
subsequently employ these Consulting Engineers,
but on what terms they should employ them. The terms quoted in (11) in 72852/30 Part I
seem