10.
178
#
and replications of other parties.
8.
Nevertheless, the immediate
Cormeil lofie for consideration of Conncil, consists
in the letter of the Master of the Mint (9th November 1869) CS.o. No 9919, reports ing Mr Davis for disobedience and for insubordinate conduct..
9.
The disobedience carsisted in
Mr. Davies refusing to refund.
little
over 216 which had been
dum)
paid him. The Audit Cluse, Mr
Silva, had been sent
ly
remaining 46 unless with Gonerem
maruy
10.
In doing
W
Mr. Kinder
plains that Mr Davies was
ment
cem =
guilty
of most insulting and insubordinate language, and as Mr Silva ( the Audit Clure)
in the
Mas
requatedly refered to
pondence, I called
an
That
quetuman for
Av
explanatory statement,
which he has given in enclosure to
CS.c. No. 2841 (23rd November). Mr Silea
me lo
ex
amine
is
a
the Books of Mr Davies and certified
that the amount in question
was
க10
clearly due from Mr Damis, who subsequently cassented to repay 410 yu but refused to maks good) the
geurtuman in whom I have
great confidence, and the Council
doubl
as
well
فی کو ہے
no
myself, will ful
satisfaction in having the
tistinom, of a third party to refute.
11.
That testimony is clear
to
A.