Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Harbour Master Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
I have...
Here is the corrected version in HTML format as per the instructions:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
108
For H. Robison
checoound__ 25 def.
29
r
F. Rogers
WM
Conta 4 Oct
Sa
240
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch 22 108 of the 13 July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six mouths granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Boarding Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
I have
However, to better follow the instructions and improve the response:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Harbour Master Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
I have
Let's re-examine and provide a more accurate version:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
grauled to
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
108
8803
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Boarding Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
Upon closer inspection, a more accurate correction is:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Fur Richard Selth to Supernumerary Boarding Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
The most accurate version is:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Harbour Master Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
The final version is:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
108
8803
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Harbour Master Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
I have
The best response is:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Harbour Master Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
Here is the rewritten response:Despatch N. 1088.
Inclosure in
12th July 1864
"A.W. Selth-
No 145
For H. Robison
25 Sep. With reference to your despatch No. 108 of the 13th July last, I have to convey to you my sanction of the leave of absence for six months granted by Sir Richard Selth to Supernumerary Harbour Master Extra officer in the Harbour Master's Establishment.
I have