688
Official
Date of Adjudication.
or
Petitioner.
Creditor's Assignee.
Ma Shum,
Ng Wai Chan,
3rd
1888.
Official Creditor
THE HONGKONG GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 10TH AUGUST, 1889.
RETURN of all BANKRUPTCIES filed in the Supreme Court of Hongkong during the Year 1888.
Name.
1st Feb., 1888. | Creditors
Amount Total received amount
by
of Official debts Assignee. proved.
REMARKS.
3,059.99 No Schedule filed.
Debts in
Assets.
Schedule.
$
$
356.30
277.72
1,395.60
No Schedule filed.
53
Ma Sing alias Ma Oi Shi,
9th
"}
1888. Bankrupt
36,303.84141,972.26
2.66
12,603.29
Chu Shing Cheong alias Chu Chuk
Pang and Leung Yee Cheung.... 22nd 1888. Kwok Yuk Kai alias Kwok Màu
>>
6,615,97
3,121.10 347.35
4,503.37
Fai,
Leung Yung alias Peter Young..........
15th Mar., 1888.
Official
Lam Ching Po.
8,199.88 3,270.97 2,147.78
328.75
30.00
649.10 1,469.64
Not proceeded with.
Pétition refused.
Chan Sam Kwai alias Chan Kwai
Нор,
John William Croker,
5th July, 1888.
Official
Chang A Yeong,
Luiz Mariano Pinto,..
Edith Laurence,
Dhunjeebhoy Dorabjec,.
Edgar Louis Heymans and Gas-
ton Louis Heymans..
Frederick Hunerfauth,
José Nepoceno Larcina,.
Francisco
309.00 34.991.03 569.69 2,058.75
Not proceeded with.
29,406.44 13,202.47 22,962.67*
Not proceeded with.
9.59.00
453.30
118,00
Not proceeded with. Petition refused.
27
9th Aug., 1888.
""
11
nede Gonsalves,
15th Oct., 1888. Creditors 23rd 1888. Bankrupt 22nd Dec., 1888.
Official
Official
12,097.52 3,333.55
7.882.15 2,260.77
161.15
7,234.49
2,166.37
4,685,64
Not proceeded with. No Schedule filed.
1,143.18 15,086.55
180.75 2,565.65
965.81
$56.25
11
Total,.
$123,310.04189,667.47| 18,942.39
59,985.85
Registry Supreme Court, Hongkong, 1st April, 1889.
ALFRED G. WISE, Acting Registrar.
RETURN of BANKRUPT and INTESTATE ESTATES and of all JUDICIAL DEPOSITS, paid into the Treasury, by the Registrar of the Supreme Court, during the Year ended 31st December, 1888.
DATE.
•
1888.
ESTATE, CAUSE OR ACCOUNT.
JUDICIAL INTESTATE BANKRUPT DEPOSITS. ESTATES. ESTATES.
TOTAL.
March 26 Buckow, Adolph, Unclaimed balance,
15.45
22
"2
Down, James
Do.,
18.45
"
Roberts, Frank
Do.,
2.25
77
27
Kwok Ting Sui,
Dony
2.75
**
""
Smyth, James R.
Do.,
10.26
Sept.
18 Speechly v. Webster,
.Suit No., 167 of 1877,...
4.22
Chan Yau v. Li Kam,
988
1877,.
3.48
"}
Poon Lai San v. Revena,
236
1878,...
1.50
Lo Uv. S. R. Neate,
39
1061 1877,...
14.21
Cheung Kwong v. Yau Cheong,
605 1874,...
1.32
"
Chui Pun v. Aitken,
547 1878,...
9.45
37
99
Cheung Kun & anr. v. Li Ling Shing, Lee Fat v. Australian S. N. Coy,
881 1878,....
4.00
""
29
""
22
128 1879,...
14.00
Dayoormell v. Bryant,
748 1879,
16.00
29
""
A. F. Smith v. Ho Tai,
910 1879,
4.34
27
39
Rajah Singh v. Abdool Khan,
504 1879,
1.00
""
多
Lee Ahmoon v. Lou Man Po, Mak Sew Wan 7. Hon Chong,
21
868 1879,
16.13
980 1879,
8.75
""
Lam U-Lai v. Betts,..
Utter Singh e. Mahomed,..
U-kwan Cheong v. Klampermeyer,..... Kwan Mi-ho . W. M. B. Arthur,. Fong Wing Shan v. T. 1. Bowler, Chan Leung-fu v. Wong Pung
Sheong,
Yeung Fu v. Norman,
Chan Wa Hi v. Chung Wing,
Suit Nos. 1009 to 1024, Balance of sale
Li Chi v. Ng Kam,
Suit No. 496, Balance of sale,
Suit No. 939 Tsang Achoy v. Hol
""
22
240 1880,.
12.65
"
وو
471 1880,.
2.40
897 1880,...
.25
"
31
""
72
1056 1880,...
8.40
475 1981,..
3.25
"7
""
589 1881,...
28.50
27
"3
750 1881,...
27.
**
1009/
1024
189
1881,... 1881,...
.20 10.39
1.34
496
1882,
10.50
"7
245
22
כן
1882,
1.10
939
1882,...
9.23
Kam Moon, Balance of sale,... [
33
75
Chun Kwai v. Dare,
""
1882,...
4.00
Lui Pek-tsz v. Cheung Kan,....................
وو
618-22
1882,.
9.61
Li Pat Hing v. Leong Yon,.....
255 1883,.
.99
>>
Do.,
Wong In Chin e. Yew Luk,.
Do., Do.,
v. Man Kow,
Wong Yiu Chew v. Tang Wing, v. Lee A-kee,..
27
>>
649 1883,.
7.78
656 1883,.
3.16
وو
v. Mok Yung,
""
""
655 1883,.
6.92
338 1883,...
8.00
77
>>
>>
653 1883,...
5.40
Carried forward,.....
232.47
49.16
: